|
|
||||||||||
|
|||||||
(Synopsis) Mårdberg and Carlstedt describe their work regarding the computerized Swedish Enlistment Battery — a multi-level hierarchical model of cognitive abilities. They argue that findings of their study indicate that the (Thurstonian) notion of simple structure can not be assumed to be a general principle holding for cognitive test factors. One can not help but be impressed with their systematic implementation of PC technology and should note their having planned for maintaining flexibility in programming tools, providing for potentially more advanced statistical modeling and test-item presentation variations during early phases of their project. Additionally, it is significant that CBT implementation was interdisciplinary — with UI design being the responsibility of psychologists, and programming being done by professional computer programmers. The careful reader will also note that user-acceptance of the CBT technology regarding least-talented vs. most-talented subjects resulted in an unexpected outcome. (Synopsis from: Booth, 1998, pg. 59.) |
||||
Booth, J. F. (1998). Guest Editorial. Special Issue: Uses of PC technology in selection and assessment. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 6 (2), 57-60.
|
||||